microsoft-yahoo merger mistake
Is Microsoft going down the same road as the ill-fated AOL-Time Warner merger with its hostile takeover bid of Yahoo?
Microsoft has offered $44.6 billion in cash and stock to purchase Yahoo, or $31 a share, a 62 percent premium on Yahoo’s closing price on January 31.
Microsoft predicts that the merger would bring about efficiencies that would save around $1 billion annually. As it estimates that the value of online advertising will go up to $80 billion in the next three years, Microsoft is hoping to boost its share of that pie by capturing it together with Yahoo.
On paper, they seem like a good match - the world’s biggest software company hooking up with one of the largest internet media companies.
Both had been leaders in their respective fields but fell short in the online world when they ran up against the 1000-pound gorilla Google, especially Yahoo, as both itself and Microsoft have struggled to match Google’s dominance in capturing the internet search market and online advertising dollars.
The deal is a godsend for Yahoo shareholders.
The company’s shares surged after the news of the takeover offer. Yahoo is currently vulnerable, with its share prices down a third in the past year and recent announcements of slashing 1,000 jobs to cut costs, even as it offered a gloomy outlook for the rest of the year. Its chairman Terry Semel also stepped down in a shakeup, after being deposed of the chief executive position in June.
According to CNBC, Yahoo has over 500 million visitors at its range of media sites including Yahoo Mail, the world’s biggest e-mail service for consumers.
But analysts have justifiably been skeptical of the value of this bid for Microsoft, its most expensive to date.
Even if the deal goes through, many factors still point to the enormity of the work ahead for Microsoft.
For a a start, melding the two different cultures and technologies of both companies will be a huge hurdle for Microsoft.
As a sign of its worry that a brain drain would hemorrhage Yahoo if the deal is successful, Microsoft has tried to overcome the problem by offering generous retention packages to Yahoo engineers, key leaders and employees.
They would also have to sort out how to deal with their similar online services, from instant messaging and email, to news, sports and travel sites. Should they close down the MSN sites in favor of a Yahoo brand, or would there continue to be separate services?
More pertinently, Microsoft is paying a huge premium to be just number two in internet search behind Google and it does not make sense.
Estimates put Google’s share of the worldwide web search market at around 77 percent, while Yahoo is second with 16 percent and Microsoft a distant third with 3.7 percent. Combined, Microsoft-Yahoo would still be a distant second, with just around 20 per cent.
It is hard to see both of them being any more innovative to eat into Google’s dominance by much.
Microsoft-Yahoo would have about 20-24 per cent of the global search advertising market, an analyst at Oppenheimer told the Financial Times. The paper added that Google is estimated to have captured about 70 per cent of search advertising, which accounts for nearly 45 per cent of all online advertising.
Again, it is questionable if Microsoft-Yahoo can come up with new platforms that will steal substantial market share from Google, after Microsoft’s $6 billion purchase of online advertising company aQuantitive last May did not deliver profit to Microsoft’s online services division.
And why is it subjecting the merged entity to the possibility of facing anti-trust scrutiny, not just in the US but likely in Europe too?
The bottom line is, Microsoft and Steve Ballmer are desperate to be a factor on the internet. Despite having spent hundreds of millions to beef up its internet business, Microsoft’s efforts in the area is still not profitable. The FT said that Microsoft’s online services division, while only making up five per cent of Microsoft’s revenues, had been loss-making, to the tune of $510 million in the last half of 2007.
Yahoo’s board and shareholders should be smart enough to take the offer and run as the firm is in decline, but may yet try to extract a few more dollars out of Microsoft.
If the deal finalizes, it would be the largest in the internet market since the $182 billion purchase of Time Warner by AOL in 2001.
We know how that deal turned out. It has often been cited as one of the worst mergers in recent corporate history, as factors such as the incompatible corporate cultures of both companies and predicted synergies that did not occur caused the deal to sour, to the extent that Time Warner is looking to sell AOL.
So good luck Microsoft, looks like you would need it.

[...] post by absolutely alex Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]
[...] post by absolutely alex and posted by Alfred [...]
I don’t know much, but I do know that I am currently kicking myself in the *ss for not purchasing Yahoo stock last week when I had the chance, and had completely filled out the E-trade purchase form, but had last second doubts about a tech stock. DARN IT!!!!! ARRGHH!!!!
Did anyone say Vista? That alienated a lot of people and these people will not like this merger.
What about my email account with yahoo? Unlike many other online web mail accounts, mine does POP3. Right now I can and do read yahoo mail with Outlook, but in the future? I am fairly sure that after this merger I will not be using my yahoo account with Outlook!
They will move it all across to Hotmail, albeit with the yahoo name, and this should work a treat with Outlook, but by then I will be exclusively using ‘Horde’ to read my email online, by which time they will stop the POP3 access…
This is a good deal for shareholders in both camps - M$ get on the web and away from applications that you have to install. They also get a great brand and a roadmap that makes sense - ad revenue and online services.
Yahoo shareholders get out with a fair price, not the undervalued price the stock is now.
For the deal to work they will be careful to not upset the customers, i.e. email users like me. Although I never pay money to yahoo, the advertisers do.
If the customers walk away then it gets harder to get the advertisement revenue and it all falls apart.
A more interesting move - right now - is the acquisition/cash injection by the New York Times of WordPress. WordPress is one of those 99% content things and, as we all know, content is king.
Yahoo is not content per se, but the search engine does point to a vast quantity of WordPress pages(!)